fbpx

Students Know What They Are Told to Want: The Non-Native Teacher Debate

“The mind knows not what the tongue wants.” That was bestselling author Malcolm Gladwell during a 2004 TED Talk, quoting famed American market researcher and psychophysicist Howard Moskowitz. The talk, entitled “Choice, happiness, and spaghetti sauce,” detailed Moskowitz’s revolutionary research which profoundly altered the food industry.

Most famous for his research into people’s tastes for spaghetti sauce in the early 1980s, Moskowitz fundamentally changed the way food companies thought about making clients happy. Two of the most famous spaghetti sauce companies, Prego and Ragu, both hired Moskowitz to fix their brands, both of which had grown financially stagnate.

At the time, the two dominant types of sauce were plain and spicy. However, after creating and offering 45 different variations of hand-made sauces he prepared for the American population, Moskowitz determined that there was a third sauce type that was deeply desired: extra-chunky. The mystery was that neither Prego nor Ragu offered an extra-chunky option.

Up to that point, both companies had operated based on the assumption that the only way to find out what people wanted was to ask them. Over a three decade span, not one person — either through a focus group, survey, data research, etc. — had ever said they preferred extra-chunky spaghetti sauce even though, as the research showed, a significant number of them actually did.

What Howard Moskowitz discovered, and what can be extrapolated across a myriad of other mediums, is that a big part of human nature is not being able to explain what we really want; rather, given an option, we statistically go with the known entity.

When I was asked by my good friend Marek Kiczkowiak to contribute to this terrific cause, Moskowitz’s analogy was the first thing to come to mind as that line of reasoning remains one of the greatest barriers still preventing equality among native and non-native language instructors. As a former Director of Studies of a language institute in Latin America, I can say with conviction that one of the largest, if not the largest, barriers still hindering non-native English speakers as teachers is that students don’t want them. Rather, students think they don’t want them.

Allow me to elaborate. Current and prospective English learners are continually told by the industry that native instruction is superior. On the surface this makes sense as who better to instruct a language than those who speak it natively? That is, until you peel back the kimono of English language instruction. What students often don’t consider, even though it may be the most obvious point of the entire discussion, is that ESL is a business. And, in my experience, the business aspect has continually fueled the circular argument that has increasingly made non-native instructors unemployable.

Schools promote native instruction because it brings in business. Students enroll at schools that offer native teachers because that same school claims native speakers are better teachers. And on goes the cycle until it becomes accepted rhetoric.

WP
When negotiating with clients in Latin America, one of the first questions I was asked was about where our teachers were from. If it didn’t come up in the first few minutes, we would always make a point to emphasize it. Not because we were proud of the fact, but because it was a selling point. We did employ non-native instructors, but we were always forced to schedule them with caution. At a new client, a non-native teacher meant a bad first impression; for some high-profile clients, requests for native speakers would frequently flood my inbox; passports were always checked before resumes.

In the Asian market it’s even worse. English teaching jobs in South Korea are almost entirely for native speakers, and even they experience intra-cultural discrimination. If a native speaker is anything but fair skinned, their ability is also deemed inadequate because they don’t meet the physical profile (read Michael Griffin’s post about it here).

Which brings us full circle to the main point: the industry has disguised what students actually want with what they think they want.

…[native teachers] shouldn’t be hired simply for being native speakers just as non-native speakers with ample experience ought not be brushed aside because they aren’t.

The irony in all of this is that most, if not all, ESL learners who have experience with a non-native instructor will tell you that they had absolutely no issue with how the class was delivered. The non-native teachers that I employed experienced tremendous success not because they were personable, international, or carried good senses of humor but because they were good teachers. The other traits are no doubt also important, but students, first and foremost, inherently want a qualified teacher; any student will tell you their first priority is to learn and where their teacher is from is not of great importance.

Which helps perpetuate the incredibly important notion that nativism is certainly not synonymous with qualified — an idea that is increasingly gaining more traction globally. If students or corporate language clients had a greater awareness of how many native ESL instructors gain certification — generally in a four week crash course with little to no practical experience — they may not be so eager to take their classes. That’s not to say that inexperienced teachers shouldn’t be considered, but they shouldn’t be hired simply for being native speakers just as non-native speakers with ample experience ought not be brushed aside because they aren’t.

The answer lies in a two-pronged solution that combines heightened client awareness of what constitutes a valued learning process as well in a responsibility on the part of schools or educational institutes not to succumb to ill-founded client demands; just as no responsible doctor would allow patients to self-diagnose themselves, language institutions cannot let their clientele gauge the quality of instructors.

“That is the final, and I think most beautiful, lesson of Howard Moskowitz: that in embracing the diversity of human beings, we will find a surer way to true happiness.” This is how Gladwell closed his talk, and how I will as well. Optimism remains that a true embracement of human diversity will soon trickle into the current impasse in the language instructor debate. I’m confident that with increased exposure the quality of teachers, not the origin of their passports, will ultimately prevail.

Andrew Woodbury

From Toronto, Canada, Andrew was formerly the Director of Studies of Inlingua, Costa Rica, where he lived for over three years. Now living in Toronto, he is an English language instructor at the International Language Academy of Canada, where he delivers university preparation courses. As a writer, Andrew is a Young Voices Advocate and regular contributor with the PanAm Post. Follow him on Twitter, or read his blog.

 

 

Show this post some love. Share it with colleagues.

Share on facebook
Share on whatsapp
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on vk
Share on pinterest
Share on email

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
trackback

[…] to come soon, and why I’m getting back into writing on a more regular basis, but for now this is an article I wrote for TEFL Equity Advocates, a cause that is close to my […]

trackback

[…] “The mind knows not what the tongue wants.” That was bestselling author Malcolm Gladwell during a 2004 TED Talk, quoting famed American market researcher and psychophysicist Howard Moskowitz. The t…  […]

ajarnralphsblog
Guest

Reblogged this on Ajarn Ralph's Nook.

Marek - TEFL Equity Advocates & Academy
Admin

NIce one. Cheers

ajarnralphsblog
Guest

thanks for coming by 🙂

ajarnralphsblog
Guest

yeah…I’m not so sure in other countries, but here in Thailand, an American high school drop out hired as a teacher receives a salary two times higher than a Filipino professional teacher (with a Teacher’s Licence issued by the Thai Ministry of Education)…just because the white guy has got blue eyes and blond hair 😛

Marek - TEFL Equity Advocates & Academy
Admin

Ajarnral – you should put together an article for this website about it. If the case gets enough exposure, and if enough people start condemning such practices, there might be a small chance they will go away in the future.

trackback

[…] A thoughtful article by Andrew Woodbury about non-native speaker v native-speaker English teachers caused an enormous comment thread when […]

Julia Villamizar
Guest
Julia Villamizar

Excellent. Your sentence ‘nativism is certainly not synonymous with qualified’ explains it all. Sometimes a non-native teacher better understands many students’ problems, s/he can even predict them and detect the reason of many difficulties. S/he could be able share his/her experiences about solving those problems. Many native English teachers have never learnt a second language.

Torn Halves
Member

We are on the look-out for interesting turns of phrase, and your “peel back the kimono of English language instruction” was a nice one. We are also on the look-out for parts of the argument that don’t quite gel, and we wonder if there is one in your comparison between chunky spaghetti sauce and the non-native speaker teacher in English language education. The story of the sauce highlights the very real phenomenon of people thinking they want one thing but really wanting something else. But the applicability of that story is limited by the fact that in the case of… Read more »

Marek - TEFL Equity Advocates & Academy
Admin

Hi Torn, Thanks for this thoughtful comment. I agree that Andrew’s analogy has some flaws and it’s not perfect (as probably most analogies). You rightly point out that people didn’t discriminate against chunks. They simply didn’t know they wanted them. While I agree with what you say next, i.e. the problem is that of prejudice, not ignorance, I would add that ignorance forms a very important part of that problem indeed. There is a large group of students who do not really know whether they would like to be taught by a NEST or a NNEST. They might not even… Read more »

danchik6344
Guest

While I agree completely that it is grotesquely unfair for NNESTS to be overlooked in favour of entirely unskilled and barely qualified NESTS, I have to admit a deep sense of frustration bordering on sadness with the fact that whenever this question is raised, there is an utterly predictable rush to blame the usual suspects of ‘prejudice’ and ‘big business’. To be frank, the depiction of learners as helpless victims of machiavellian American businessmen, unwittingly being manoeuvred into wanting something they don’t really want is itself a condescending, prejudiced and one-dimensional view of those same learners. I’d also argue that… Read more »

Todd
Guest
Todd

I agree. In university I studied Spanish and French. I was pleased that my Spanish teacher came from Spain and I was disappointed that my French teacher wasn’t actually French and no amount of credentials could shake my opinion that somehow she wasn’t as qualified or teach me something incorrect. Now, knowing what I know, I admit these sentiments were prejudicial, but I may have not understood why if I hadn’t later become involved with teaching as a profession. Most learners, I’m sure, follow a similar train of thought. It is probably natural for those who don’t understand what it… Read more »

Marek - TEFL Equity Advocates & Academy
Admin

Thanks for commenting, Todd. I think you hit the nail on the head. While many students might want or expect to have classes with NESTs, it is because this seems like the obvious answer, especially if they haven’t had any good NNESTs, or if the schools in their country market NESTs as the only solution to all your language problems. In a nutshell, most students are NOT informed clients, and many schools live off that ignorance. Secondly, I’d say that the vast majority of the sts who expect classes with NESTs are quite open to persuasion. In a recent interview,… Read more »

trackback

[…] put NNESTs at an instant disadvantage, while most recently Andrew Woodberry argued in his post that students want classes with NESTs, because the industry has led them to believe that only a […]

Ted
Guest
Ted

Good point. I couldnt agree more. Of course. Here in spain you have to have min a degree, tefl cert/dip and experience. In my experience native mother tongue speakers, with the previously mentioned, have a better understading of the more subtle ambiguitied of the language. Plus, ive never met a non native teacher who speaks better than a native…

trackback

[…] you to understand what characteristics make certain teachers unforgettable, so that you can make an informed choice and pick the best language […]

trackback

[…] on a train I found 4 in 5 minutes. As many other people have pointed out (here, here, here, here and here), this is discrimination – excluding someone possibly qualified for the job on the […]

channamasala
Guest

I had some trouble logging into WordPress and don’t see my comment, so my apologies if this posts twice. Basically, I almost 100% agree and especially in the country where I teach, I think opening up the industry beyond “she’s a (white) foreigner, she can teach” would be immensely beneficial. It would force employers and students to ruminate more on qualification and ability and less on skin tone, language and nation of origin and that can only be a good thing. But I’d like to take a bit of an issue with the end of this piece: the baseline qualification… Read more »

trackback

[…] For a more detailed analysis of the ‘native speaker preference’ check out Andrew Woodbury’s excellent article. […]

trackback

[…] For a more detailed analysis of the ‘native speaker preference’ check out Andrew Woodbury’s excellent article. […]

Join our Community

Support Equality. Tackle Native Speakerism. Learn to teach English as a Lingua Franca

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on reddit
Share on vk